Cambridge Core – Philosophy Texts – Kierkegaard: Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Cambridge Core – Theology – Kierkegaard’s ‘Concluding Unscientific Postscript’ – edited by Rick Anthony Furtak. One of the most noteworthy features of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide is that it lives up to its subtitle.
|Published (Last):||7 April 2007|
|PDF File Size:||2.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Or does it matter more that the prayer be genuine with regard to matters of “subjective” postscriipt — i. Such radical subjectivism about faith is not, however, the actual thrust of the famous line.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikipedia
Richard Arnot Home Bett Cambridge: And yet this may also be the highest earnestness. Through the discipline of resignation, aiming at an absolute commitment to the highest good, through the discipline of suffering, through the consciousness of guilt, the way leads step by step to a more profound pathos, until by a leap we reach the absolute maximum of subjectivity in the Christian consciousness of sin, with its imperative need for a new departure.
An objectivist understanding of truth expresses itself, therefore, not merely in terms of practical materialism, but also in a general quantification of all life, as it may be seen in the craving for records in sport, in pride in the growth of cities of millions of inhabitants, in respect for the multi-millionaire, in admiration for great political power.
The first total opponent of Hegel’s standpoint was Soren Kierkegaard, father of modern existentialism. In what follows I touch on some of the essays that resonated most powerfully on my reading, in part doubtless because they speak to my own interests in the text. No, I had another interpretation of it.
Having made these distinctions, the Postscript then tries to specify the Christian’s peculiar predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity.
Swenson and Walter Lowrie Princeton: Cambridge UPp.
The Postscript ‘s uncomfortable solution is to try to wave at what it cannot touch. It was an attack on unscientiific Kierkegaard saw as Hegel’s deterministic philosophy. And Kierkegaard himself should not be called the father of modern existentialism. Subjective truth is essential concludung ethico-religious truth.
We would then obtain: The first contribution from M. And it is here that the book’s trouble begins. By contrast, the passionless Christian is so far from fulfilling the task of praying to God that he may be regarded as having utterly flouted it namely, as though he were an enthusiast of idolatryeven if he has gotten his prayer’s objective dimension right.
Piety persuasively supports her conclusion with a detailed analysis of kiwrkegaard different senses of truth at work in the Postscript.
One option might be to use “un-God” for Afgud instead of “idol”. Here is Hannay’s version in full: Material being is merely quantitative being. The second two contributions do focus on more specific textual issues than many of the others, but again each has a direct bearing on the interpretation of the work as a whole. According to Climacus, all objective knowledge is subject to doubt. It discusses Christianity’s content by means of analogies which it keeps taking back, citing variations on the formula understanding is revocationn, That dynamic is the unique means by which faith navigates the inevitable losses, heartbreaks, and separations that punctuate human life.
In the original, i Sandhed serves as an adverbial phrase modifying the verb “prays” [ beder ]; it does not imply anything about the identity of the object of prayer.
With characteristic courage, Hannay opts for “truly”, rather than “in truth”, to render i Sandhed. This fact can be a convenience, but it can also be a curse; in borderline cases, kietkegaard tempts the translator to sacrifice English clarity for sharper surface echoes of the Danish.
This is a regrettable missed opportunity: The way to Christianity goes through a decision, a crucial decision in the temporal moment; faith kierkgaard an existential leap. The dozen essays collected here none penned by a Dane, interestingly speak to the largest themes of this notoriously difficult and overlong unscientiflc and stay admirably focused on what the reader needs to keep in mind very generally to come to grips with the text.
Readings that attempt a collapse of one of these to the other cannot be sustained, but how to understand their kierkegaars precisely is clearly a matter of ongoing debate. The Kierkfgaard Hopkins UP,pp. This does not suffice to solve the riddle of the Revocation. Hannay strikes a similar tone — informative, but with a light touch — in his Introduction’s second half, where he sketches the Postscript ‘s various polemical targets Hegel, of course, but even more so the Danish Hegelian pair Heiberg and Martensen, along with the Romantic theologian Grundtvig.
Pages to import images to Wikidata Articles containing Danish-language text Webarchive kietkegaard wayback links All stub articles.
None of these essays is narrowly focused on any minor issue or local question; instead each one concerns a major point, generally one that has implications for understanding the Postscript as a whole or even more broadly, the Climacan authorship.
Although Climacus repeatedly states that Christianity is not a doctrine but an existence-communication, this should not be taken to mean that he holds that Christianity lacks doctrinal content. For my part, as much as Mooney contributes to developing this key theme, more work could yet be done here to postscropt the particulars.
She wrote the following in This, according to Hannay, is why the Postscript ‘s revocation should not detract from the book’s value as an analysis of Christianity. The Postscript famously, and to some notoriously, prefers the latter standard of authenticity.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikiquote
It is an inevitable consequence of the objectivist conception of truth: Wilde and William Kimmel, eds. Certainly Tillich, who is often critical of Hegel, nearly always speaks in praise of Kierkegaard, and he gives such an important place in his own thinking to the category of existence that he seems at times to be travelling in the Danish thinker’s footsteps.
This page was last edited on 30 Decemberat In the sphere of material being the quantum is the only differentiating factor.
These are not oversights or criticisms of the essays collected here but intimations of what might yet be developed in thinking about the Postscript. What is more, it brings Kierkegaard’s painstaking use of grammar, so central to his philosophical method, one step closer to the English reader.