Problemas del realismo – Georg Lukács El asalto a la razón. La trayectoria del irracionalismo desde Schelling hasta Hitler – Georg Lukács. by Lu ka qi; Georg Lukacs.; Wang jiu xing.;. Print book. Chinese El asalto a la razón: la trayectoria del irracionalismo by György Lukács · El asalto a la razón . (). Introduccion General a la Historia de Derecho. Barcelona, Gedisa. LESSIG , , , , , LUKACS, Georg. (). El asalto a la razon.
|Published (Last):||5 February 2018|
|PDF File Size:||12.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But eternal recurrence revokes, in his opinion, all transcendence and hence the basis of all Christian or socialist morality. Thus ljkacs wrote in The Genealogy of Morals The similarity to which Kaufmann draws attention is of a purely external, stylistic nature.
Stylistically, Nietzsche had a great liking for most of these authors.
Let us just point out once more that Nietzsche never, of course, rejected equality out of general ethical considerations; his attitude was the direct result of his stance with regard to democracy, revolution and socialism, which to his mind were necessary fruits of the dominion of Christianity.
It implied an active rejection of the chief enemy, namely the working class and socialism. It must deliberately restrain itself from reverting to one of its old forms, and must have not only the intention but also the means of preserving itself from all repetition Bismarck, however, being essentially a diplomat of the Bonapartist period, was only briefly carried beyond the narrow aims of a Prussian reactionary policy by the movement for German unity. Activism — of the counter-revolutionary variety — was more over gaining in significance for Nietzsche.
While developments in Russia form an exception to this, they were not known to contemporary thinkers outside Russia. Nietzsche criticized Bismarck very sharply — hence he could not possibly be a reactionary. Admittedly, it does not tally with the structure which the individual philosopher himself intends to give his work. Everything to nip in the bud even the first requirement — through the most irresponsible thoughtlessness, we have killed outright the instincts enabling the worker to exist as a class, enabling the worker himself to exist.
His lla society has prohibited; the liveliest impulses he has borne within him are quickly entangled razom the crushing emotions of suspicion, fear and ignominy.
The Destruction of Reason. Academic schools of thought have often reproached Nietzsche with having no system, something they held to be necessary to a likacs philosopher. And the content of this battle, which initially was waged directly against the movement obstructing the georf fruition of his ideology, Nietsche moreover defined in the draft, several months earlier, of his letter dedicating The Birth of Tragedy to Richard Wagner.
Small wonder that it is precisely his fascist followers, such as Baeumler, who lay so much stress on his derivation from Heraclitus. Nietzsche, in turn, could become witty once more because, as a result of his method of indirect apologetics, he commanded a wide field for ruthless criticism, especially in the cultural sphere.
We must also remember that the obfuscating and disordering of the asaltp sciences in the imperialist age proceeded largely along the lines of racial theory race replacing class.
And their outcome deter mined — philosophically — the Concrete questions of the interpretation of history, etc. It amounted to what we identified in our second chapter as the indirect apologetics of capitalism. The ideological consequences of these events were very widespread.
Die Zerstörung der Vernunft der Weg des Irrationalismus von Schelling Zu Hitler
To do so would merely reveal his political naivety and economic ignorance. The chief manifestations of decadence he perceived quite correctly: And correctly so from the class standpoint, since the overwhelming majority thereby lukavs for Nietzsche has later been ready to take practical steps matching this outlook.
Now this changed quite decisively in the second half of the seventies.
If we have some end in view we must also wish for the means. Understanding master races and slave races only in a very general and mythicized sense, georf took into account only ethico-social considerations.
This content and method of Nietzschean philosophy were most intimately connected with his literary manner of expression, namely the aphorism. At last we have stable foundations on which the whole future can safely build!
The Destruction of Reason by Georg Lukacs
We can see how great the temptation was right through the imperialist period. We must not forget that even the young Nietzsche was never a really orthodox disciple of Schopenhauer with regard to radical a-historicism.
We shall refrain here from raising the historio-philological questions of influence, etc. We exposed in our preceding chapter this kind of modern reactionary defence against philosophical progress and the dialectical method, and we traced the essence and methodology of modern irrationalism back to precisely this type of reaction.
WorksBerlinVol. Request removal from index. During the rise of irrationalism, epistemological questions played a decisive role in philosophy. Impossible, henceforth, for wild and sense less mountain waters once more to ruin the fertile fields of civilization overnight!
It offered a road which avoided the need for any break, or indeed any serious conflict, with the bourgeoisie. Such a desire rendered the struggles of the burgeoning new class, the proletariat, extremely attractive for most of these intellectuals. Much as the basic objectives accorded with the ideological outlook of the parasitical intelligentsia, to voice them in a systematic, brutal and open fashion would have repelled a wide and not insignificant circle.
But since the Third Reich needed a synthesis of all the reactionary currents in German history, it had to regard itself as a fusion of Nietzsche and Bismarck on a higher i. In The Will to Power he wrote: In books on Nietzsche there was at one time a violent controversy as to whether and how far Nietzsche should be considered a Darwinist.