Fede E Ragione, Liberta E Tolleranza (Riflessioni a partire dal discorso di Benedetto XVI all’Universita di Ratisbona) [Carl Anderson, et al Angela Ales Bello] on. La provocazione del logos cristiano. Il “Discorso di Ratisbona” di Benedetto XVI e le sfide interculturali, , available at Book Depository with free. Get this from a library! La provocazione del logos cristiano: il discorso di Ratisbona di Benedetto XVI e le sfide interculturali. [Laurent Mazas; Gabriele.
|Published (Last):||20 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||9.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Vatican II teaches Catholics to come to such a common discourse. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. In the Muslim world, this quotation has unfortunately been taken as an expression of my personal position, thus arousing understandable indignation. In my inaugural lecture at Bonn inI tried to address the issue,  and I do not intend to repeat here what I said on that occasion, but I would like to describe at least briefly what was new about this second stage of dehellenization.
Does that make Catholic teaching irrational, or the Catholic God an irrational God? But naturally the emperor also know the instructions, devloped later and recorded in the Qur’an, concerning holy war. These in fact were a quotation from a medieval text, which do not in any way express my personal thought. On the other hand, there is nature’s capacity to be exploited for our purposes, and here only the possibility of verification or falsification through experimentation can yield decisive certainty.
In questo contesto, importanza essenziale assumono i contributi dei vari gruppi linguistici. What if God, willing to show ratibona wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath made for destruction, and that he might make known the riches of his glory on vessels of mercy, which he prepared beforehand for glory, us, whom he also called, not from the Jews only, but also from the Gentiles?
The intention here is not one of retrenchment or negative criticism, but of broadening our concept of reason and its application. Now nothing is opposed to the idea of being except non-being. I tredici firmatari ricoprono ruoli di prima grandezza nella gerarchia della Chiesa.
Will the thing formed ask him who formed it: Yet the order placed in creation by divine wisdom, in which order the notion of His justice consists, as said above, is not so ci to the divine wisdom that the divine wisdom should be restricted to this present order of things.
Metaphysics appeared as a premise derived from another source, from which faith had to be liberated in order to become once more fully itself. Thus, the question of whether or not an omnipotent God can make them should not even arise.
Ma prima e dopo questa lettera vi sono stati altri interventi di rilievo. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazm went ciscorso far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Nonetheless, the fundamental decisions made about the relationship between faith and the use of human reason are part of the faith itself; they are developments consonant with the nature of faith itself.
The Bible, in both the Old Testament and the New Testament, is full of repeated affirmations of the total sovereignty of the will of God.
Il Discorso di Ratisbona di Benedetto XVI
Hence it is better to say that such things cannot be done, than that God cannot do them. It is one of the suras of the early dlscorso, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. Pope Benedict XVI’s September 12 speech in Regensburg caused an unwanted firestorm in the Islamic world because of the pope’s quoting, in passing, an insulting reference made by a 14th-century Byzantine emperor.
Attempts to construct an ethic from the rules of evolution or from psychology and sociology, end rqtisbona being simply inadequate.
– L’Italia svelata dai cablogrammi – l’Espresso/Wikileaks
On the basis of mistaken and very widespread assertions, the rationalist critique of the time attacked faith and denied the possibility of any knowledge which was not the fruit of reason’s natural capacities. Tagle, arcivescovo di Manila e presidente delegato del sinodo, ha improvvisamente detto che riguardo alla relazione finale “attendiamo la decisione del papa”.
It is pointless, however, for Christians and Muslims to exchange accusations of irrationality based on their contrasting communal experiences of what they take to be extra-rational ruptures of the divine into history.
Per non dire del calendario ufficiale dei lavori del sinodo, che tuttora assegna ben quattro giorni, dal 21 al 24 ottobre, alla scrittura della “relazione finale”, alla sua presentazione in aula, alla discussione e presentazione delle osservazioni scritte, alla riscrittura della stessa, alla sua ripresentazione in aula e alla sua votazione definitiva: Share your thoughts with other customers. Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants.
They do not have what it takes to be not because of a logical contradiction, but because of an ontological failure to be. The crucified Son of God is the historic event upon which every attempt of the mind to construct an adequate explanation of the meaning of existence upon merely human argumentation comes to grief.
Le nuove procedure che guidano il sinodo sembrano assicurare un’influenza eccessiva sulle deliberazioni del sinodo e sul documento sinodale finale. It concludes with an echo of the Manuel quotation to affirm that reason and faith can and must go together. Therefore, that which implies being and non-being at the same time is repugnant to the idea of an absolutely possible thing, within the scope of the divine omnipotence.
Martinetti is also keen to undermine my claim that the Catholic tradition itself, and especially Thomas Aquinas, does not support the elevation of Reason above God.
Chiesa e islam. A Ratisbona è spuntato un virgulto di dialogo
Certitude, certitude, feeling, joy, peace! The dialogue ranges widely over the structures of faith contained in the Bible and in the Qur’an, and deals especially with the image of God and of man, while necessarily returning repeatedly to the relationship of the three Laws: While, I am no Thomist, I dare bring the attention of Martinetti to the following facts.
Upon return from a trip, popes customarily reflect upon the trip at the next public opportunity; in this case, that means the Wednesday audience on September The scientific ethos, moreover, is – as you yourself mentioned, Magnificent Rector – the will to be obedient to the truth, and, as such, it embodies an attitude which belongs to the essential decisions of the Christian spirit.
The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: Furthermore, having different authoritative revelatory criteria for the doctrine of God does not necessarily mean that we have different Gods. Memories and Reflections”, fairly long at roughly words, was of a learned sort, and focused on the relationship of reason and faith in the Western world. Nella quale si proclama il valore universale di alcuni principi razionalmente conoscibili e applicabili, tra cui il principio di non contraddizione: Other prominent Catholics around the world, such as British Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor, also came to the pope’s defense.
Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. The encounter between the Biblical message and Greek thought did not happen by chance. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. Bertone criticized the media for its role in the crisis, and said the pope’s words had been “seriously manipulated”. In the meantime, it must be observed that from this standpoint any attempt to maintain theology’s claim to be “scientific” would end up reducing Christianity to a mere fragment of its former self.
He thus anchored faith exclusively in practical reason, denying it access to reality as a whole. While defenders have blamed the media, or trouble-seeking Muslims, others have noted that the firestorm could easily have been foreseen, and forestalled, had the pope circulated his text in advance to his deputies.
Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the “Book” diwcorso the “infidels”, he turns to his interlocutor somewhat brusquely with the central question on the relationship between religion and violence in general, in these words: